翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Cambridge Ring
・ Cambridge Ring (computer network)
・ Cambridge riot of 1963
・ Cambridge riot of 1967
・ Cambridge Ritualists
・ Cambridge Road (disambiguation)
・ Cambridge rules
・ Cambridge Satchel Company
・ Cambridge SCA
・ Cambridge School (intellectual history)
・ Cambridge School (Kandivali)
・ Cambridge School Indirapuram
・ Cambridge School Noida
・ Cambridge School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture
・ Cambridge School of Culinary Arts
Cambridge School of historiography
・ Cambridge School Srinivaspuri
・ Cambridge Science Centre
・ Cambridge Science Festival
・ Cambridge Science Park
・ Cambridge Scientific Center
・ Cambridge Scientific Instrument Company
・ Cambridge Scientists Anti-War Group
・ Cambridge Semiconductor Limited
・ Cambridge Seven
・ Cambridge Seven Associates
・ Cambridge Shakespeare Festival
・ Cambridge Singers
・ Cambridge Solutions
・ Cambridge Somerville Youth Study


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Cambridge School of historiography : ウィキペディア英語版
Cambridge School of historiography

The Cambridge School of historiography was a school of thought which approached the study of the British Empire from the imperialist point of view. It emerged especially at the University of Cambridge in the 1960s. John Andrew Gallagher (1919-80) was especially influential, particularly in his article with Ronald Robinson on "The Imperialism of Free Trade".
Leaders of the School include Anil Seal,〔Anil Seal, ''The Emergence of Indian Nationalism: Competition and Collaboration in the Later Nineteenth Century'' (1971)〕 Gordon Johnson,〔Gordon Johnson, ''Provincial Politics and Indian Nationalism: Bombay and the Indian National Congress 1880-1915'' (2005)〕 Richard Gordon, and David A. Washbrook.〔Rosalind O'Hanlon and David Washbrook, eds. ''Religious Cultures in Early Modern India: New Perspectives'' (2011)〕
==Criticism==
Critics have attacked various ideas of the School.〔See D.C.M. Platt, "The Imperialism of Free Trade: Some Reservations," ''Economic History Review,'' 21#2 (Aug., 1968), pp. 296-306〕 In ''The New Imperial Histories Reader,'' Stephen Howe has assembled articles by critics who take aim especially at P. J. Marshall, D. K. Fieldhouse, Robinson and Gallagher, and Peter Cain and A. G. Hopkins.〔Stephen Howe, ed. ''New Imperial Histories Reader'' (Routledge, 2009)〕
Howard Spodek, for example, praises the school's regional and pluralist perspectives but criticizes their reliance on British (rather than Indian) documentation, sloppy use of social science models, downplaying of ideology, and their excessive emphasis on Indian self-seeking and the importance of British imperial initiatives in achieving modernization. He recommends a deeper appreciation of Indian initiatives, and more attention to the emerging importance of public life in many areas of society rather than just a concentration on politics.〔Howard Spodek, "Pluralist Politics in British India: The Cambridge Cluster of Historians of Modern India," ''American Historical Review,'' (June 1979) 84#3 pp 688-707〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Cambridge School of historiography」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.